VIRGINIA GENEALOGY & HISTORY People. Places. Evidence.

KINGS OF VIRGINIA · RESEARCH LIBRARY

Research Standards

A clear distinction between a record, an interpretation, and an unresolved question.

These are the editorial standards for Kings of Virginia. Evidence labels apply to specific claims, not automatically to every statement on a page. A documented fact can still be corrected when better evidence emerges.

✓ Documented

A claim supported by identifiable source evidence, with a citation and an explanation appropriate to the claim. A record’s existence does not make every statement in it accurate.

◐ Probable

An interpretation supported by evidence but not established firmly enough to call documented. Explain the reasoning, alternatives, and missing evidence.

? Unresolved

An open question. The available evidence is insufficient to choose a conclusion. Do not fill the gap with an invented relationship or date.

⚠ Conflicting Evidence

Sources disagree in a way that affects the conclusion. Identify the conflict and explain why it has—or has not—been resolved.

Sources, corrections & AI

  • Cite sources close to the claims they support. Include enough detail for another researcher to find the same item.
  • Distinguish original records, copies, indexes, transcriptions, and later accounts.
  • Credit photographs and illustrations and describe meaningful cropping or display changes.
  • AI-generated names, documents, gravestones, quotations, dates, and images are not historical evidence.
  • Use decorative artwork only as design, label it accordingly, and never cite its pictured details as evidence.
  • Review AI-assisted transcriptions against the source before publication.
  • Keep a dated correction note when a substantive published conclusion changes.

Send a correction or conflicting source →